hidesert cowboy
Member
I dunno I would probably sell. what is crystal clear to me is the willingness to simply drain the lake. to me it makes no sense to not have demanded cut backs long ago. just simply say you're getting 10% less water until the lake gets to 3600 or 3575 or something to that effect. its unthinkable they couldn't have figured out how to save that much water and if they had, 10%?!?! just be extra careful on water use! The lake would have a buffer to handle this year. I don't see the point of just using the same amount of water. its illresponsible management.
the lake holds 6.2 million acre feet currently. as it stands over the next year they are required to release 7.5 million. That exceeds the entire capacity of the lake as it stands currently! last year at this time the lake had over 1/3rd more water in it. as the lake dries up the levels drop exponentially.
IMO you will not see the big big big problem this summer, you will see it a year from now. the lake is in trouble. This year looks like its potentially the worst year yet. Ask yourself if inflows are say 3-4 million, releases are 7.5 thats essentially a dried up lake. they will likely release more from above to juggle it, but then again the water is probably better stored in the higher cooler lakes.
the lake holds 6.2 million acre feet currently. as it stands over the next year they are required to release 7.5 million. That exceeds the entire capacity of the lake as it stands currently! last year at this time the lake had over 1/3rd more water in it. as the lake dries up the levels drop exponentially.
IMO you will not see the big big big problem this summer, you will see it a year from now. the lake is in trouble. This year looks like its potentially the worst year yet. Ask yourself if inflows are say 3-4 million, releases are 7.5 thats essentially a dried up lake. they will likely release more from above to juggle it, but then again the water is probably better stored in the higher cooler lakes.