Not supposing that the red ear or gobys are going to fix the mussel problem. But while they are eating as many mussels as they can , they will be a new food source for the other species that are suffering because of the infestation. If the water filtering mussels are depleting the shad, then a replacement or 2 would be beneficial. If it can be done at the mussels expense then the more the better. My understanding of gobys in the great lakes is that they are a big help to the walleye and smallmouth.
I understand completely when viewed through that lens. My question, and I want to ask it without offending, comes from a view through a different lens. The mussels are non-native to be sure. They are a detriment to non-native and native fish alike, in reservoirs that are equally artificial to the eco-system in question. I think that the cat is already out of the bag here and solutions need to look forward instead of looking back.
By the way, it is snowing like a son of a gun here. More fish habitat on the way.![]()
I didn't read about the migration if any in their study, but the 25% reduction of quagga in an controlled study area sounds good. Maybe they would help control the mussels around the docks in the marinas. I wonder if they hold to that type of structure like bluegills do.
How do red ear sunfish taste compared to bluegill and green sunfish?
I say talk up the benefits of red eared sunfish to the managers on the Navajo Indian Reservation and after they're planted there just wait.
It worked for gizzard shad.
I CAN'T believe I said that!! I hope I don't get banned!!