Privatized campsites? Many fear prices could skyrocket

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waterbaby

Moderator
Staff member
Privatized campsites? Many fear prices could skyrocket

Privatized campsites? Many fear prices could skyrocket
  • By Rebecca Moss | The New Mexican
  • Jun 11, 2017

U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke says government shouldn’t be in the business of running campgrounds, so he wants to turn national park campsites over to private businesses.

A handful of companies already run campsites, lodging and concessions throughout the U.S. park system, but some fear widespread privatization could make recreation and camping prohibitively expensive in Western states.

Environmental groups say Zinke’s idea is in keeping with the Trump administration’s push to turn public resources over to private entities, as well as to increase privatization of public services, from toll booths and air-traffic control to prisons.

Others say authorizing private businesses to run federal campgrounds might not change much at the campsites. But if privatization were to encroach further into the National Park Service, that could set the stage for profit motives to become more important than preservation.

More than 1.8 million people visited New Mexico’s national parks and monuments last year, spending a collective $108 million and generating more than 1,600 jobs, according to a study by Headwaters Economics, an independent research group based in Montana. White Sands National Monument, Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument are the most popular of the state’s 15 national parks and monuments.

The majority of camping on public land for the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service, run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, costs under $15 a day. Most camping on Bureau of Land Management property is free.

Developed BLM campgrounds charge fees. Those in New Mexico drew more than 67,000 paying campers, and about 168,000 visitors, in fiscal year 2016, according to Donna Hummel, a spokeswoman for the BLM.

Zinke’s Interior Department has the power to privatize campgrounds, an idea that Aaron Weiss of the Center for Western Priorities opposes.
“Anything that makes visiting our national parks more expensive is not good for America and the American people. Camping on national public lands is and must continue to be an affordable family vacation,” he said.

The Trump administration frames the issue of private companies on public lands differently. In a call with reporters last month, Zinke said: “We have not been a good partner with industry. We have not been a partner you can invest in.”

Last week he told members of the National Association of RV Parks & Campgrounds he wanted to change that.
“I don’t want to be in the business of running campgrounds,” he said. “My folks will never be as good as you are on it.”

Privatized camping already occurs to some level throughout the nation, and most hotel properties within national parks are run by private companies.

Recreation Resource Management operates several private campgrounds in Cloudcroft, but privatization has not come to New Mexico to the degree it’s occurred in other states.

Valerie Gohlke, spokeswoman for Carlsbad Caverns National Park, said private camping “probably would not impact us greatly because we don’t have a lot of visitors who want to camp.”

Xanterra Parks & Resorts is the largest government contractor for hotel and concession services in national parks, including at the Grand Canyon. Aramark Parks and Destinations, Delaware North and Forever Resorts operate in bigger national parks such as Yellowstone and Lake Powell.

The Center for American Progress found that these companies have contributed to congressional campaigns for several years, lobbying to keep contracts and trademarks associated with the parks.
Zinke said the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management, has an $11.9 billion backlog of maintenance nationwide. He has said increasing fossil fuel extraction and privatization efforts for camping might help financially.

The Interior Department’s 2018 budget proposal called for a 10.9 percent cut in funding, including decreasing funding to park maintenance by 15 percent and cutting funding for national parks by 23 percent. This proposal has drawn criticism in Congress from members of both parties.

Private companies are contractually obligated to maintain the properties they operate in national parks. But the Center for American Progress found this doesn’t always happen. Instead, the organization said, some private companies have skirted these obligations and instead further added to the backlog of maintenance for which taxpayers are responsible.

All but one of New Mexico’s national parks had hundreds of thousands of dollars in deferred maintenance as of 2016, totaling more than $213 million, according to National Park Service documents. Carlsbad Caverns National Park has the highest backlog, with $44 million in deferred maintenance, about half for a modernized elevator system. Of the overall total, $16 million in maintenance is considered critical, according to the federal budget. The backlog at Bandelier National Monument is $23 million and it’s $17 million at Chaco Canyon National Historical Park.

In April, President Donald Trump told the Interior Department to review recent national monument designations, saying many were made through abuses of executive power. The action could roll back protections for wilderness and historic lands established under the Antiquities Act since the Clinton administration in the 1990s.

The Trump administration has also called for opening up oil and gas drilling on federal land and resuming extraction of coal, which could infringe on national parks and monuments if protections are removed.

A study published last week said opening up drilling and expediting permitting on BLM property would threaten seven national parks, including Chaco Culture National Historical Park and Carlsbad Caverns.

“The Southwest’s national parks are among the most visited in the country, drawing millions of people each year with their jaw-dropping scenic wonders and recreational opportunities and supporting strong tourism economies and local jobs,” said Nicholas Lund, with the National Parks Conservation Association and author of the report, said in a statement. “Risks to these spectacular desert parks and tourism industries they support must be considered alongside proposals for oil and gas drilling right at these parks’ doorsteps.”

Chris Mehl with Headwaters Economics, said privatization could help to address maintenance deficiencies if private companies assume the responsibility, but that is not a guarantee.

“A lot of things in the park are already privatized, so for some users it might not be a big change,” he said. “The first question would be the efficacy of it. Can they operate the campground at the level of service the public expects? And the second question is, can it save taxpayers more, or save money, as Zinke said it will.”

Contact Rebecca Moss at 505-986-3011 or rmoss@sfnewmexican.com
 

Waterbaby

Moderator
Staff member
A lot of us who have been Lake Powell-goes back to the "old" days remember when the concessions were private - before Dell Webb and then Aramark buying out Dell Webb.. the concessions were all run more efficiently and the equipment worked better... while I am certain some will criticize this, I would welcome seeing our Marina's around the lake privatized.
 

PowellBride

Well-Known Member
The problem Waterbaby is that Aramark and Del Web are "private" companies, and they are likely to be the ones granted rights to run the campsites. They have the knowledge and legal expertise to manage the very convoluted government bidding process.

As the Center for American Progress is quoted saying, these private companies don't always meet thier maintenance obligations.

If Zinke truly will make the decision based on the values in the last paragraph of the article " ....can they maintain the site to meet expectations...." and " ...will it save taxpayers money..." then we should All write Zinke and be sure he is aware of the dwindling services and lack of maintenance that is happening at Powell.

I believe Aramark is only part of the problem, the government bidding process is part of the problem, and what I understand of the transfer process from concessionaire to concessionaire is part of the process. Unfortunately for all Lake Powell users, Aramark has Zero completion, no one will bid on the concessions. Some of the recent additions like the on lake restaurant at Wahweap were driven by the competition from Antelope, but there's not enough competition to really drive change. The price to "payoff" Aramark for the existing infrastructure if another concessionaire were to win a bid is prohibitive, and thus limits possible competitors to a handful of large, multi-billion corporations.

No easy answer, but I'm convinced that further privatizing our National Parks isn't it!
 

Waterbaby

Moderator
Staff member
For as long as I can remember here on Havasu most of the campsites are BLM [Department of Interior] and then a section is under State of Arizona. The AZ sites have always been better-maintained and cleaner. We did have a surge about 12 or so years ago when BLM came in to do some campsite upgrades [the campsites on the lake are boat-in sites]... they did a nice job... unfortunately it is a challenge here as many visitors do not like to leave the sites clean.
 

VanillaIceCream

Well-Known Member
I grew up at Powell from the 60's to 80's. Moved back and started going again last year. To be honest, the services are not much different from the 80's when I worked at Bullfrog. The only thing that seems a real actual improvement is the floating restrooms stationed throughout the lake.


But now I have to pay a $50 entrance fee and $50 for each boat I bring yearly...that my friends is call a ripoff.
 

Waterbaby

Moderator
Staff member
I grew up at Powell from the 60's to 80's. Moved back and started going again last year. To be honest, the services are not much different from the 80's when I worked at Bullfrog. The only thing that seems a real actual improvement is the floating restrooms stationed throughout the lake.


But now I have to pay a $50 entrance fee and $50 for each boat I bring yearly...that my friends is call a ripoff.

The thing is - it isn't just Powell. You have to pay a fee to launch at the BLM site on Havasu [a day pass to use the lake held back by a Federal Dam], and then if you pull up on a BLM beach to have lunch it costs you another $10 and most of the time the tables are in bad condition... not sitting on flat ground or positioned in shade and the trash cans are full. Heaven help you if you don't put the $10 in the box, though because "they" will show up to look for your receipt of payment for the privilige of sitting there for a few minutes in the boat you paid them to launch in the first place. Used to be your launch fee was good for the launch and the day pass on the lake......
 

Dale

Well-Known Member
Maybe structure it like the postal service does contract carriers. They can not change postal rates (park use fees), which will be limited by their contract. It could not get any worse. Nothing is run as poorly or wastefully as a government run program! The government should run nothing but their constitutional duties, which are strictly regulated! Every thing else the federal government does is illegal and unconstitutional! Every government agency except the military and the federal court system is unconstitutional and needs to be shut down! Maybe the Convention of States movement can restore sanity before the politicians spend us into oblivion!
 

Bart

Well-Known Member
Houseboats on a buoy may have to pay county taxes, too. Not just Federal taxes and fees.
 

Dale

Well-Known Member
A couple of previous posts noted that Center For American Progress, A power hungry Marxist anti American group, opposed private management of campgrounds! Anything these commie traitors oppose, is a good thing for the country!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top