Hey all...An agreement on water usage?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Joy

Active Member
The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) is a set of voluntary agreements among the 7 basin states (AZ, CA, NV, CO, NM, WY, UT), the U.S. and Mexico to use less Colorado River water. H.R. 2030 authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to execute and carryout multiple agreements in relation to the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan.

H.R. 2030 Cosponsors include Representatives: Mark Amodei (NV-02), Andy Biggs (AZ-05), Rob Bishop (UT-01), Ken Buck (CO-04), Ken Calvert (CA-42), Liz Cheney (WY-At Large), John Curtis (UT-03), Diana DeGette (CO-01), Ruben Gallego (AZ-07), Paul Gosar (AZ-04), Debra Haaland (NM-01), Steve Horsford (NV-04), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ-02), Doug Lamborn (CO-05), Susie Lee (NV-03), Debbie Lesko (AZ-08), Mike Levin (CA-49), Alan Lowenthal (CA-47), Ben Ray Lujan (NM-03), Ben McAdams (UT-04), Grace Napolitano (CA-32), Tom O'Halleran (AZ-01), Ed Perlmutter (CO-07), Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-40), Adam Schiff (CA-28), David Schweikert (AZ-06), Greg Stanton (AZ-09), Chris Stewart (UT-02), Scott Tipton (CO-03) Dina Titus (NV-01), Xochitl Torres Small (NM-02).

The DCP will reduce states’ water usage and target minimum water levels for reservoirs in the watershed including Lake Mead on the Arizona-Nevada border and Lake Powell on the Utah-Arizona border. Passage of H.R 2030 will provide certainty and ensure a reliable supply of clean water for farmers, ranchers, other water users and future generations in the 7 basin states.View the different plans codified by the DCP and a letter form the seven States of the Colorado River Basin requesting passage of federal legislation here.

Courtesy of House Committee on Natural Resources Republicans



Over the last century, water demand in the Colorado River Basin has increased while water supply has, on average, decreased. The average annual natural flows in the river are about 14.8 Million Acre-feet (maf). This is a decrease from the early 20th century flows of 18 maf, when many of these apportionments were enacted. The current natural flows no longer keeps up with the demands on the River.



The Colorado River Basin’s success is in large part due to the Basin’s water storage projects. These projects have capacity to store almost 60 maf or about four times the Colorado River’s annual flows. The Basin’s two largest dams are Glen Canyon Dam (Lake Powell) with a 26.2 maf storage capacity and Hoover Dam (Lake Mead) with 26.1 maf. These storage projects provide a reliable source of water for the Colorado River Basin.



Since 2000, the Colorado River Basin has experienced historic drought conditions. The Bureau of Reclamation has taken several actions, including the development of the 2007 Colorado River Interim Guidelines, to provide additional operational guiding principle and tools to meet the challenges of the drought.10 In December 2017, due to the continued drought, Reclamation Commissioner Brenda Burman called on the Basin States to put DCPs in place. Talks on the DCPs had been underway since 2015, but had not made significant progress until then.


The agreements include an Upper Colorado River Basin DCP and a Lower Colorado River Basin DCP. The Upper Basin DCP protects elevations at Glen Canyon Dam by keeping them above 3,525 feet, which is 35 ft above the minimum elevation needed to run the dam’s hydroelectric plan. In addition, it will help assure continued compliance with the 1922 Colorado River Compact and authorize storage of conserved water in the Upper Basin that could help establish the foundation for a Demand Management Program that may be developed in the future.

Courtesy of Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Brenda Burman


The Colorado River irrigates nearly 5.5 million acres of farmland and serves approximately 40 million people in major metropolitan areas across nine states in the United States and Mexico including Denver, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tucson, Los Angeles, San Diego, Mexicali and Tijuana, and a number of tribal reservations.



The Colorado River Basin (Basin) is currently experiencing its worst drought in recorded history. The period from 2000 through 2018 is the driest 19-year period in over 100 years and one of the driest periods in the 1,200-year paleo-record.



Over a decade ago, responding to five years of intense drought, the Department of the Interior (Interior) worked with the Basin States, tribes and other stakeholders in the Basin to adopt operating rules for Glen Canyon and Hoover Dams. These operating rules are known as the 2007 Interim Guidelines and were adopted to better coordinate the operations of Lakes Powell and Lake Mead, encourage water conservation, and to provide objective rules for shortages and reductions of water use in the Lower Basin by Arizona and Nevada.



Since 2007, the drought has persisted and more action, such as combining provisions requiring reduced use of water with new incentives to conserve water, is needed to protect these reservoirs that are essential to our environment and economy.



Following the extremely dry years of 2012 and 2013, when the Colorado River experienced the lowest 2-year runoff period in modern recordkeeping, the seven Colorado River Basin States began pursuing drought contingency plans. In 2014, Reclamation and the Basin States initiated a series of pilot projects to encourage additional, compensated, water conservation. Most recently, the adoption in September 2017 of a new, long-term cooperative agreement with Mexico known as Minute 323 included additional important water conservation and savings actions by Mexico. Some of these water savings actions would only be triggered if the DCPs are completed in the US, which intensified efforts to complete the DCPs in the Upper and Lower Basins.



In December 2017, [Commissioner Burman] called on all seven Basin States and key water districts in the Lower Basin to complete their work on finalizing the drought contingency plans by the end of 2018. During development of the DCPs, the states requested, and received, technical assistance from Interior on such matters as the projected risk facing the basin as a result of long-term drought. Interior is proud to have worked collaboratively with the States, tribes, non-governmental organizations and other Basin stakeholders on the DCPs.

Courtesy of the seven States of the Colorado River Basin 3.19.19 letter

The Colorado River provides water to approximately 40 million people and 5.5 million acres of irrigated agriculture in the Upper Basin (Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming) and Lower Basin (Arizona, California and Nevada). Since 2000, the Basin has experienced historically dry conditions and combined storage in Lakes Powell and Mead has reached its lowest level since Lake Powell initially began filling in the 1960s. Last year’s runoff into the Colorado River was the second lowest since 2000, and there is no sign that the trend of extended dry conditions will end any time soon even if 2019 provides above average runoff. Lakes Powell and Mead could reach critically low levels as early as 2021 if conditions do not significantly improve. Declining reservoirs threaten water supplies that are essential to the economy, environment, and health of the Southwestern United States.



Working together, the seven Basin States have developed drought contingency plans that are reflected in the agreements attached to this letter. We hereby request passage of federal legislation that would authorize and direct the Secretary of the Interior to sign and implement the agreements upon execution by the non-federal parties.



Federal legislation and subsequent implementation of the agreements will enable prompt action to enhance conservation of Colorado River water and provide us with water management tools necessary to address a looming crisis. These tools will assist us in reducing the probability that Lakes Powell and Mead will decline to critically low elevations
 
The agreements include an Upper Colorado River Basin DCP and a Lower Colorado River Basin DCP. The Upper Basin DCP protects elevations at Glen Canyon Dam by keeping them above 3,525 feet, which is 35 ft above the minimum elevation needed to run the dam’s hydroelectric plan.

Joy, what does this tangibly mean to Lake Powell lovers? Thanks for the info..

It means that the lake can drop another ~40 feet below the current level before they stop sending water downstream. This would mean none of the boat ramps would be usable.


The current natural flows no longer keeps up with the demands on the River.

if you take more out than you put in......


Hayduke lives.
 
Well heck...I was hoping someone else could read it and see some good and great news in it...as the politicians sure seem to be happy with themselves.
 
I would assume a balance of inflow vs outflow needs to be in the planning to prevent it from reaching that 3525 and still have it operate. As someone stated in another thread, 3525 reduces the current water volume in the lake by almost a third(I think). This bill basically is saying for now you will still have a lake, just figure out how you will access it to use it.
 
I would assume a balance of inflow vs outflow needs to be in the planning to prevent it from reaching that 3525 and still have it operate. As someone stated in another thread, 3525 reduces the current water volume in the lake by almost a third(I think). This bill basically is saying for now you will still have a lake, just figure out how you will access it to use it.
Yep... dropping the lake to 3525 would reduce the current volume of 9.0 MAF to 6.1 MAF, or a reduction by a third...
 
It seems to me that there "is" a plan in place that is being followed regarding how much water to let out of Lake Powell, and how this impacts Lake Mead water levels, but this plan is not readily known to the rest of us. We know about the changes to lake level management made back in 2007(?), but this new proclamation makes it seem like they will continue to let more water out than is coming in for the foreseeable future to prop up Lake Mead - until the lake level hits 3525. At which time, as others have said, the lake becomes unusable recreationally in the same way it is being used today. Scary.

If this is the plan, it seems the drainers just won the war, and we don't even know it yet! -Doug
 
Last edited:
Somehow we survived the low water years at the beginning of this century (that sounds weird), but things can get pretty messed up. I was just looking at GoogleEarth images from 2004. It's hard to imagine having to go back to that marina configuration (if it's even possible).
BF 2004.jpg
 
It seems to me that there "is" a plan in place that is being followed regarding how much water to let out of Lake Powell, and how this impacts Lake Mead water levels, but this plan is not readily known to the rest of us. We know about the changes to lake level management made back in 2007(?), but this new proclamation makes it seem like they will continue to let more water out than is coming in for the foreseeable future to prop up Lake Mead - until the lake level hits 3525. At which time, as others have said, at that level it is basically unusable recreationally in the same way it is being used today. Scary.

If this is the plan, it seems the drainers just won the war, and we don't even know it yet! -Doug

Time to sell the houseboat?
 
3525'??? That would shut down the entire lake like PBH said, but it would also shut down all the businesses that count on the lake traffic including mine. :(
I'm happy they set a minimum but it needs to be a minimum that will also support the economy that depends on the lake. What really needs to be addressed is water usage and conservation. Why not start on that now instead of waiting until the lake does get to 3525' and they are FORCED to go into conserving mode.
 
Time to sell the houseboat?
Funny you mention that - luckily my cruiser has a market on the ocean, but would be interesting to see where all the houseboats could go - hopefully it doesn't come to that.

What is real though is that the number of beaches will be much fewer this year until the water comes back up and fills some of the side canyons. Today, many canyons that would accommodate 15 houseboats in the past could handle maybe 3. Luckily, by July, even at 3600 most of the canyons open back up.
 
Funny you mention that - luckily my cruiser has a market on the ocean, but would be interesting to see where all the houseboats could go - hopefully it doesn't come to that.

What is real though is that the number of beaches will be much fewer this year until the water comes back up and fills some of the side canyons. Today, many canyons that would accommodate 15 houseboats in the past could handle maybe 3. Luckily, by July, even at 3600 most of the canyons open back up.
Yep, more shoreline generally means more campsites. Not to put too fine a point on it, but here's a series of aerials of Dungeon Canyon from lake level 3558 through 3655 at roughly the same scale... plus a map that shows the 3700 and 3600 level... this really illustrates the concept...

That said, in certain cases (in a few side canyons) new beaches will open up at lower lake levels, but you've got to hunt and peck for those...
 

Attachments

  • Dungeon 3700 - dark blue is 3600.jpg
    Dungeon 3700 - dark blue is 3600.jpg
    199.2 KB · Views: 27
  • Dungeon 3655  9-14-11.jpg
    Dungeon 3655 9-14-11.jpg
    346.1 KB · Views: 28
  • Dungeon 3638  6-22-09.jpg
    Dungeon 3638 6-22-09.jpg
    310.5 KB · Views: 26
  • Dungeon 3609  7-12-06.jpg
    Dungeon 3609 7-12-06.jpg
    365.5 KB · Views: 25
  • Dungeon 3598  5-29-13.jpg
    Dungeon 3598 5-29-13.jpg
    347.5 KB · Views: 26
  • Dungeon 3591  4-6-15.jpg
    Dungeon 3591 4-6-15.jpg
    377.1 KB · Views: 26
  • Dungeon 3574  8-24-04.jpg
    Dungeon 3574 8-24-04.jpg
    346.8 KB · Views: 27
  • Dungeon 3558  3-7-05.jpg
    Dungeon 3558 3-7-05.jpg
    310.2 KB · Views: 28
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top