The Crossing of the Fathers... and why the Dominguez-Escalante expedition matters to you and me...

Status
Not open for further replies.

JFRCalifornia

Keeper of San Juan Secrets
Padre Bay
September 4, 2011
Lake Elevation 3655'


In 1776, while revolution raged along the eastern seaboard, the future of the west was left in the hands of two Catholic priests. It had taken over 150 years for the Spanish Empire to gain even a tenuous foothold in the southwestern deserts, mostly in the form of a few scattered missions among the Pueblo tribes in what is now modern New Mexico. The most successful of these, Santa Fe, had been the base of Spanish missionary operations on the edge of their imperial frontier since it was founded in 1609, but even then it was subject to occasional native insurrection, as the Indians resisted conversion at every turn. In 1680, a tribal revolt ravaged the Santa Fe archives, setting back the settlement, and reminding the overlords back in Spain that more support—both military and religious—would be needed to make the remote southwest into a profitable extension of the empire. But after a series of disastrous 17th century setbacks in Europe—notably wars and plague—that saw the empire eroded from within and essentially left leaderless, Spain could not afford to focus on distant outposts in North America, especially unprofitable ones. So little help was forthcoming, and the few soldiers and priests left to watch over this distant frontier faced the arduous task of building an empire from scratch, one sure to take several generations to complete.

The Pueblo Indians—the Hopi and Zuni descendants of the long-vanished Anasazi—didn’t make this any easier. They were tough customers, not easy to bring into the Christian fold, with their naked dance rituals and other curious tribal customs. The lack of resources (especially water), vast distances, and generally unknown lands full of tribes rumored to be hostile, left little choice to the local Spanish authorities but to hold on and wait for better days.

Things began to look up somewhat in the 18th century, when Spain was able to successfully establish a series of missions along the California coast, first in Baja, then farther north by the latter half of the century. In 1769, the Spanish established armed garrisons to protect new missions in San Diego and Monterey, and from there the new strategy was to spread from these two bases, ultimately linking with other established outposts to create a more workable imperial network, based on Indian slave labor, unified under Jesus Christ, and motivated by Spanish soldiers with guns.

What lay between Monterey and Santa Fe was largely unknown, apart from rumors spread through sporadic contact and trade with exotic tribes in the deserts and canyons. Very little of this area had been mapped at all, much less even seen, and there was no known safe route to link Spain’s holdings in New Mexico with California, over a thousand miles away. In 1776, New Mexico’s Spanish Governor Don Pedro Fermin de Mendinueta pondered that difficult task, and knew that to succeed in finding a route would require someone familiar with the Indian tribes, as well as the more remote corners of the desert, to the extent they were known.

What better person for the job than a priest?

Especially one who had recently toured the New Mexican missions. Father Francisco Atanasio Dominguez, a native of what is now Mexico, had been called north in 1775 not only to inspect the missions, but to assess the lives of the frontier padres, the relations with the local Indian populations, and the damage to the Santa Fe archives ravaged in the 1680 revolt. In short, the Franciscan priest quickly became the foremost political expert on Spanish-Indian relations in New Mexico, and a natural choice for the assignment.

But the governor realized Dominguez needed inside help, and that came in the form of fellow Franciscan Father Silvestre Velez de Escalante. A European by birth, Escalante had already spent many years in Santa Fe, and often traveled to the Zuni and Hopi villages seeking converts. Where Dominguez saw the political big picture, and could assess the difficult situation as an outsider, Escalante had worked directly with these people for many years, and had established a practical working relationship with the locals. Together, they would make an ideal team to find a workable route to Monterey, using their understanding of what it took to travel though a harsh desert landscape filled with potentially hostile tribes. Of course, neither of them had any practical knowledge of tribes they had never met, nor of lands they had never seen.

What they did have was an armful of rumors, and a general idea to avoid the tribes directly northwest of Santa Fe, particularly the feared Chirumas, who were believed to be vicious cannibals. Instead, they decided to take a more circuitous route through the lands of the relatively friendly Utes, first by heading due north, then west.

Padres Route.jpg

After a three-week delay to deal with an unexpected Comanche raid, the two priests finally left Santa Fe on July 29, and gathered a party along the way that eventually included twelve Spanish colonials and two Indians. About half of these recruits were especially helpful, with firsthand knowledge of the areas through which they would travel, particularly through modern day Colorado. But little was known once they crossed the present-day Utah border near what is now Dinosaur National Monument. Soon the hired guides led the priests to the valley just south of modern-day Salt Lake City, and sensing this might be an opportunity for Spanish settlement, they took their time to assess the area for possible colonization. But the delay set back their travel timetable, and unexpected early October storms forced them to abandon any hope of making it to Monterey by winter. Instead, Dominguez and Escalante decided to return to Santa Fe, through the familiar Hopi and Havasupai land of northern Arizona, completing what would be a great circle through what is now the Four Corners region.

The problem with this route, and not known to them at the time, was that they would have to re-cross the Colorado River to get back to Santa Fe, only this time far downstream of the easier location their guides had taken them in present day Colorado. When they finally encountered the river, it was a mile straight down, in the awesome gorge of the Grand Canyon. It would be impossible to cross in northern Arizona. So they continued northeast, skirting the river upstream along the canyons till reaching a relatively wide ford in a butte strewn valley in the heart of lower Glen Canyon, just north of the present day Utah-Arizona line. Here they could cross easily, and they did so in November 1776, through the wide and shallow river, placid among the gentle pink-colored canyons. They then returned to Santa Fe, having failed to reach California. History shows that the Spanish also failed to settle the Utah Valley, near Salt Lake, which had looked so promising, leaving that to future settlers on an entirely different religious mission, the Mormons, some 70 years later.

But even in their failure, without realizing it, the two priests had just made a huge contribution to western geography. They became the first Europeans to find a practical crossing of the Colorado River at a location that until then had been unknown to white people. The river’s course through Glen Canyon—in fact that Glen Canyon existed at all—had not been known. Today, El Vado de los Padres—the Crossing of the Fathers—is an important landmark in the west. But since 1963, it has laid silently, 300 feet under the water of Lake Powell, between two sandstone monoliths whose modern names recall what had happened here centuries before. There’s Dominguez Butte, standing guard on the lake’s southern shore, and a mile away to the north, smaller Padres Butte, surrounded by the waters of Padre Bay. The trail of the priests leads away to the southeast, above Face Canyon, along what is now a path used by modern Navajo shepherds and hikers with Camelbaks.

The hundreds of houseboaters and jet skiers that cruise by this site along the lake every day generally have no idea (much less care) about the history of the crossing laying hundreds of feet below their hulls; no idea of a drowned plaque that commemorates the event, nearly as important as the American Revolution of the same year, maybe even more so to these boaters. Because while those two Catholic priests failed to make it to Monterey, they unwittingly opened the west to trappers, adventurers, Mormons, explorers, geologists, and the finally the Bureau of Reclamation who built Glen Canyon Dam, without which, none of those boaters would be there at all.

That includes us.

11-09-04 Dominguez hike 1 3655.jpg11-09-04 Dominguez hike 4 3655.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 11-09-04 Dominguez hike 5 3655.jpg
    11-09-04 Dominguez hike 5 3655.jpg
    389 KB · Views: 80
  • 11-09-04 Padre Dominguez camp 2 3655.jpg
    11-09-04 Padre Dominguez camp 2 3655.jpg
    386.3 KB · Views: 81
Last edited:
By the way, can I suggest an edit?

But be it far for me to pretend to hold a candle to your knowledge, your width and breadth and depth of knowledge astounds me.

The first time you reference the valley in Utah the way you wrote it it made me think you were talking about the Salt Lake Valley. When you referenced the second time it was clear that you were talking about Utah Valley which is the next Valley south of the Salt Lake Valley. I believe the expedition stopped at the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon and looked out onto Utah Lake. That is Utah Valley. From there they turned south and never made it to the Salt Lake Valley.

Don’t take this as criticism, you can write it anyway you want, but it did cause some confusion for me
 
Last edited:
By the way, can I suggest an edit?

But be it far for me to pretend to hold a candle to your knowledge, you’re width and breadth and depth of knowledge astounds me.

The first time you reference the valley in Utah the way you wrote it it made me think you were talking about the Salt Lake Valley. When you referenced the second time it was clear that you were talking about Utah Valley which is the next Valley south of the Salt Lake Valley. I believe the expedition stopped at the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon and looked out onto Utah Lake. That is Utah Valley. From there they turned south and never made it to the Salt Lake Valley.

Don’t take this as criticism, you can write it anyway you want, but it did cause some confusion for me
No worries--I always appreciate any and all corrections! I have to rely on the expertise of others, because my firsthand knowledge is limited mainly because I don't live in Utah... and besides, I wrote that on the roof of a houseboat nine years ago... :)

Thanks again for reading!
 
Thank you for an interesting read. Did Father Escalante ever get back to the area? I am presuming the Escalante River system bears his name.
Would have liked to have seen that area prior to Glen Canyon Dam, however I was born long after the gates closed and the water rose.
 
You tend to think of priests as old, but these two guys were relatively young. Dominguez was 36 and Escalante was just 26 when they made the famous journey. Dominguez was much better connected to the outside politics of the Spanish Empire, but Escalante was the one who knew the locals better in and around Santa Fe. After their return to Santa Fe in early January 1777, they went their separate ways, but both ended up heading south for Mexico City, although for different reasons. Escalante had some medical problems in 1780, and was heading to Mexico City to be treated, but never got that far, dying in Parral, which is about 400 miles south of what's now El Paso, in what became the modern Mexican state of Chihuahua (Mexico didn't exist until 1821). He was only 30.

Dominguez lived much longer, and after getting back to Mexico City, he submitted a highly critical report to his superiors of how the New Mexican missions were run, which led to his falling out of favor with those in charge. As a "reward", his next assignment was to be banished to a remote outpost in Sonora. He ended up near Janos in Chihuahua, not far south of the modern New Mexico border, where he died sometime just after 1800.

And yes, the town and river are named after Escalante the priest...
 
Both Tad Nichols "Glen Canyon, Images of a Lost World" and Gregory Crompton "Ghosts of Glen Canyon" publish an excerpt from the diary of Escalante. In summary, the "Fathers" first tried to cross at the Paria River (later the site of Lees Ferry) using crude floating crafts, but the river was too fast and cold. The weather was foul, and supplies were low, and the men were desperate. So they worked their way upstream trying to gain other access to the river. One camp was yards from the present-day Wahweap Resort (called San Diego), and another was across from the mouth of Navajo Canyon. Finally a scout found a route down Padre Canyon, and by five o'clock on Nov 7th, the entire party of thirteen men and their animals had crossed the Colorado. The party celebrated their achievement "by praising God, our Lord, and firing off a few muskets as a sign of the great joy we all felt at having overcome so great a difficulty." The ford was named on the spot "La Purisima Concepcion de la Virgen Santisima" (the Immaculate Conception of the Most Holy Virgin). Crompton (page 35) has several pictures that he took in 1959 of that path down Padre Canyon, including steps chipped into the steepest portions of the descent (like Moqui steps) to keep the animals from falling. The point of crossing was pinpointed in 1937 (pictures included from Utah State Historical Society) and a marker was placed on the canyon wall at the mouth of Padre Creek. Crompton's book contains a picture of this marker, which was removed before it was covered by the rising waters of Lake Powell. To help visualize the crossing, his book has several detailed pictures of the area (both on site and from the air) which were taken before the construction of the Glen Canyon dam.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for an interesting read. Did Father Escalante ever get back to the area? I am presuming the Escalante River system bears his name.
Would have liked to have seen that area prior to Glen Canyon Dam, however I was born long after the gates closed and the water rose.
Just a note, you probably would never have had a chance to see it with out the lake. It would be too hard to access and only the river gave access before the lake except for a few trails like rainbow bridge. Very few would have the opportunity to see what we sometimes take for granted on the water.
 
Just a note, you probably would never have had a chance to see it with out the lake. It would be too hard to access and only the river gave access before the lake except for a few trails like rainbow bridge. Very few would have the opportunity to see what we sometimes take for granted on the water.
Indeed, I remember taking a boat down to Rainbow bridge and seeing how long a trip it is down there. And then imagine not having a lake to travel on. Also went into the Cathedral. Beautiful boating experience.
 
So for those pre-1963 river explorers, 99% of their float trips put in near Hite. There was actually a US Post Office in White Canyon, Utah until the lake filled that far, and it was closed down in 1964/1965. You could drive a dirt road either from Hanksville through North Wash, or from Blanding through White Canyon.

On the so-called "fast" itinerary, with little time to explore any but the 2 most prominent side canyons farther down the river, the first night stop was usually Olympia Bar near Tapestry Wall. To cover these approximately 30 miles in one day took some rowing of the wooden boats, or gas in the outboard motors of the large rafts. This is because as the river takes its lazy 155 mile course from Hite to Lees Ferry, the water is mostly placid, dropping barely 2 feet per mile. (compare to the San Juan which drops 6 feet per mile) The biggest rapids in Glen Canyon were maybe class 2, and occurred near Ticaboo and at the mouth of Bullfrog Creek.

Again on the fast itinerary, the second night stop was usually near Halls Creek. An extra day allowed exploration of the Escalante River, with its 6 mile one-way hike up to Cathedral in the Desert. The next night was at Music Temple which, along with Hidden Passage directly north across the river, which was a staple trip stop. Music Temple, similar to Cathedral in the Desert, named by Major Powell himself, is only a blip on the map these days, lost since 1963 when the lake covered it.

Next was Forbidding Canyon (Aztec Creek) where another 6 mile one-way hike awaited the faithful who would hike in to see Rainbow Bridge. West Canyon was usually the 2nd to last night, and Kane Creek in Padre Bay was another final stop. Once dam construction started in 1959, pull-out was required at this point (maybe down 3 more miles to Warm Creek if the Bureau of Reclamation was generous) because these were the last access points via dirt road down to the river until Lees Ferry, and approaching the dam area was said to be a security issue.

A side note: part of the 1964 mega Bible film "The Greatest Story Ever Told" was filmed in Glen Canyon as the lake waters rose. Charlton Heston was John the Baptist, and stood for a couple of hours in November 1963 cold with a wetsuit underneath his robe while he baptized the extras gathered up from miles around. Page was only a construction site. For a first-hand description with more details, here is a link from one of the production managers.


Before dam construction started, the last 30 miles down to Lees Ferry was mostly a transit enclosed by high cliff walls, except for a welcome break at the mouth of Wahweap canyon, which offered one last draught of cool refreshing spring water.

The "slower" itineraries allowed for exploration of many side canyons along the way, 90+ in all. Of course, drinking water was provided by those riparian streams.

Logistics, especially food, was a trick in those days. Igloo and Yeti coolers were not available, and the trusty Coleman stove with its propane fuel cartridges was a luxury reserved for larger float rafts. Commercial trips in Glen Canyon in the 1950s and 1960s were very few and far between. Most private trips (my 73 year old neighbor went with his Scout troop in 1962) relied on a lot of beef jerky, canned pork and beans, oatmeal with powdered milk, and, if lucky, on the newly developed freeze dried foods, mostly cooked over campfires in sooty pots, washed out with river sand morning and night. Sometimes a watermelon could be kept cool enough to provide a feast the first night out.

Many trip diaries talk of seeing just one or two other parties (or none) for the entire 150 mile voyage. No sounds except the rustling of the water. Idyllic would be the word. Just imagine the canyon walls 250-350 feet higher, with greenery and animal/bird life abounding.

But yes, the flooding of Glen Canyon has provided access to this beautiful country for millions of people, water storage for power generation, and great fishing. Either way, wild river or deep blue lake, it's God's country.

Definitely different times, fading away quickly, as do most 60+ year old memories. I've seen latter version of the river. I wish I could have seen the former as well.
 
Last edited:
So for those pre-1963 river explorers, 99% of their float trips put in near Hite. There was actually a US Post Office in White Canyon, Utah until the lake filled that far, and it was closed down in 1964/1965. You could drive a dirt road either from Hanksville through North Wash, or from Blanding through White Canyon.

On the so-called "fast" itinerary, with little time to explore any but the 2 most prominent side canyons farther down the river, the first night stop was usually Olympia Bar near Tapestry Wall. To cover these approximately 30 miles in one day took some rowing of the wooden boats, or gas in the outboard motors of the large rafts. This is because as the river takes its lazy 155 mile course from Hite to Lees Ferry, the water is mostly placid, dropping barely 2 feet per mile. (compare to the San Juan which drops 6 feet per mile) The biggest rapids in Glen Canyon were maybe class 2.5, and occurred near Ticaboo and at the mouth of Bullfrog Creek.

Again on the fast itinerary, the second night stop was usually near Halls Creek. An extra day allowed exploration of the Escalante River, with its 6 mile one-way hike up to Cathedral in the Desert. The next night was at Music Temple which, along with Hidden Passage directly north across the river, which was a staple trip stop. Music Temple, similar to Cathedral in the Desert, named by Major Powell himself, is only a blip on the map these days, lost since 1963 when the lake covered it.

Next was Forbidding Canyon (Aztec Creek) where another 6 mile one-way hike awaited the faithful who would hike in to see Rainbow Bridge. West Canyon was usually the 2nd to last night, and Kane Creek in Padre Bay was another final stop. Once dam construction started in 1959, pull-out was required at this point (maybe down 3 more miles to Warm Creek if the Bureau of Reclamation was generous) because these were the last access points via dirt road down to the river until Lees Ferry, and approaching the dam area was said to be a security issue.

A side note: part of the 1964 mega Bible film "The Greatest Story Ever Told" was filmed in Glen Canyon as the lake waters rose. Charlton Heston was John the Baptist, and stood for a couple of hours in November 1963 cold with a wetsuit underneath his robe while he baptized the extras gathered up from miles around. Page was only a construction site. For a first-hand description with more details, here is a link from one of the production managers.


Before dam construction started, the last 30 miles down to Lees Ferry was mostly a transit enclosed by high cliff walls, except for a welcome break at the mouth of Wahweap canyon, which offered one last draught of cool refreshing spring water.

The "slower" itineraries allowed for exploration of many side canyons along the way, 90+ in all. Of course, drinking water was provided by those riparian streams.

Logistics, especially food, was a trick in those days. Igloo and Yeti coolers were not available, and the trusty Coleman stove with its propane fuel cartridges was a luxury reserved for larger float rafts. Most private trips (my 73 year old neighbor went with his Scout troop) relied on a lot of beef jerky, canned pork and beans, oatmeal with powdered milk, and, if lucky, on the newly developed freeze dried foods, mostly cooked over campfires in sooty pots, washed out with river sand morning and night. Sometimes a watermelon could be kept cool enough to provide a feast the first night out.

Many trip diaries talk of seeing just one or two other parties (or none) for the entire 150 mile trip. No sounds except the rustling of the water. Idyllic would be the word. Just imagine the canyon walls 250-350 feet higher, with greenery and animal/bird life abounding. But yes, the flooding of Glen Canyon has provided access to millions of people, water storage for power generation, and great fishing. Definitely different times, fading away quickly, as do most 60+ year old memories.
That’s an outstanding description of a pre-lake trip. Thanks for doing that! Yes indeed, it’s a different place, a different experience, one that is lost, though something is gained too...

If we had the chance to have a “do over”, knowing what we know now, I would have been on the side of preserving the river. No question. But we are today where we are, and we play the hand we’re dealt. You can lament what is lost, wish for something you never saw, but the only thing in this world that is constant is that things change... and in this case, we have something pretty spectacular, a place that reveals something new for everything it conceals...

It’s a mystery wrapped in a riddle, never boring, beauty and sadness in a bundle, and there’s no other place like it on Earth...

That’s why I keep going back...
 
On our early August trip when we put in at Hite it gave a glimpse of what things might have been like, if even for only a few miles. From the mouth of Farley to Hite it was just the river. And in the brief stretch between those two points we saw a small group of Bighorns, a coyote, a fox, raptors and at least twenty blue herons. The Lake is all I’ve ever known, but it would be pretty amazing to see what the entire area was like before the Dam.

And that was also a wonderful write up on the crossing JFR, when my wife and I went to south end this year I made mention of where the crossing was. My wife couldn’t get over the fact it was buried by hundreds of feet of water.

Powell is an extraordinary place, different views, and experience every time. It can never get old.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top