Reducing Emissions in Utah

Status
Not open for further replies.

wayne gustaveson

Moderator
Staff member
Here is a news release from UT Governor Herbert concerning reduction of annual emissions I support his efforts so I thought I would share it here:


In 2017 the Utah Department of Environmental Quality and Gov. Gary Herbert announced a lofty goal to reduce annual emissions into Utah’s air by 25 percent by 2026 – an ambitious benchmark by any standard of measure and one made more difficult by Utah’s rapidly growing population.

How exactly do we reach a 25 percent reduction? The Governor’s FY 2020 budget recommends $100 million to make that goal a reality. The Governor’s air quality plan calls on Utah residents, businesses and industry to each do their part.

Yes, there have been meaningful steps in recent years. The Legislature has provided funding for a new air monitoring center and a new lab, as well as public education campaigns and grant money for individuals and businesses to exchange dirty engines for cleaner ones. But, the $100 million raises the investment in Utah’s future to an unprecedented level. And that money will go directly to fund projects with the highest potential to improve air quality, such as:

  • Replacing wood-burning stoves and fireplaces with cleaner-burning natural gas versions. Wood stoves are a major source of winter-time pollution, one that directly impacts the health of everyone in Utah’s valleys. Past exchange efforts have replaced more than 1,500 wood-burning stoves and fireplaces in Cache, Utah, and Salt Lake counties, and there is a current waiting list of 2,000 families wanting to swap out their wood-burning appliances.
  • Exchanging dirty two-stroke lawn mowers and snow blowers for electric ones. More than 12,000 people have signed on to a waiting list to exchange their dirty gas-guzzlers for emissions-free electric tools. Snow blowers alone account for 2 percent of all emissions during winter-time inversions.
  • Swapping out older, dirtier diesel engines used by industry, school buses, semi-trucks, and mass transit vehicles for cleaner-burning ones, something that will result in high bang for the buck in terms of air quality.
  • Encouraging state agencies to develop telecommuting plans for state workers, and remodeling state office buildings to be more energy efficient, including electric vehicle infrastructure at those buildings.
The Governor’s investment provides the resources and tools to help make the 25 percent reduction a reality. And there is every reason to believe it will work. The steps taken to date — stringent controls on industry emissions, practical new regulations, cleaner technologies, and public education – have achieved remarkable improvements. In 2002, more than 2.5 million tons of pollution was emitted into Utah’s air, or more than one ton per person. By 2017, even as the population had exploded, total emissions had dropped to 1.7 million tons, only about a half ton per person.

In other words, per-person pollution is about half today what it was in 2002. The challenge is Utah’s population is continuing to grow. Each person, more than ever before, will have to do their part to make certain the air we breathe is healthy for all residents.
 
Too bad Barney decided to shut it down. Is he doing OK health wise?

I'm sure we have crossed path's at various FBO's. on Sunday afternoons.
 
I'm very leary of any of these studies, that break it down to a "per-person" amount of pollution. In my opinion, we have VERY little impact on those numbers. A single forest fire will dump more into the air than a hundred cities pollute in a year.

That is no reason to be specifically wasteful, but the theory of "lets throw $100 million" at the issue hasn't worked, Federally, or with individual states.
 
Pollution Perspective: One Giant Cargo Ship Emits As Much As 50 MILLION Cars

Link to article

I read this a few years ago when the feds were implementing the new emissions standards for pleasure marine engines. As you can imagine, the emissions savings from the expensive changes to pleasure marine engines are near zero when compared to cargo ship emissions, which, at the time, were not regulated (I think are more regulated now requiring low sulfur fuel among other things).

There are also arguments made that compare emissions on a 'per car shipped' basis for cargo ships vs. 18 wheelers, and it makes the overall argument against cargo ships less spectacular. If you Google search this study, there are many varying opinions but the overall statement headlining the article is not disputed.

I support Governor Herbert's plan in general, but I am suspect on what a $100 million investment will do - all of the items listed are good, but I'd like to see real numerical goals that are measurable - reduce lawnmower emissions from X to Y, etc. - someway I'd like to know at the end if $100 million actually measurable improved anything.

I'm all for being smart with our environment where we can so we can all enjoy the great outdoors for a long time to come, but I don't want to bankrupt the USA pushing for environmental solutions when many countries in the rest of the world don't seem to care.
 
Last edited:
Pollution Perspectivea: One Giant Cargo Ship Emits As Much As 50 MILLION Cars

Link to article

I read this a few years ago when the feds were implementing the new emissions standards for pleasure marine engines. As you can imagine, the emissions savings from the expensive changes to pleasure marine engines are near zero when compared to cargo ship emissions, which, at the time, were not regulated (I think are more regulated now requiring low sulfur fuel among other things).

There are also arguments made that compare emissions on a 'per car shipped' basis for cargo ships vs. 18 wheelers, and it makes the overall argument against cargo ships less spectacular. If you Google search this study, there are many varying opinions but the overall statement headlining the article is not disputed.

I support Governor Herbert's plan in general, but I am suspect on what a $100 million investment will do - all of the items listed are good, but I'd like to see real numerical goals that are measurable - reduce lawnmower emissions from X to Y, etc. - someway I'd like to know at the end if $100 million actually measurable improved anything.

I'm all for being smart with our environment where we can so we can all enjoy the great outdoors for a long time to come, but I don't want to bankrupt the USA pushing for environmental solutions when many countries in the rest of the world don't seem to care.
I don’t have the data to back this up so don’t throw things at me but last week I had a science teacher tell me that man only contributes three one thousands of a percent towards global warming. That surprised me so I asked him if that was of one percent he repeated it, less that three one thousandths of one percent. Pretty deep thought provoking statement in my opinion. Just sharing what I was told, that’s all ! This could lead to a ton of rebuttals and I don’t have any answers to give. I agree with Pegasus statement though. How much do we spend before it makes a difference? I also agree we need to improve so don’t take this wrong please. Just sharing a statement to see reactions, they should be good.
 
I really don't think we need to worry.

I have gone through all the numbers 😵 and especially this week with Alexandria Occasional-Cortex's Green New Deal I am resting much easier and while reading it I only spit up a small amount of coffee through my nose.

Now all I have to do is sit on my couch and wait for my free house, free salary, free health care, free food(no beef though). etc., etc., etc. to all start rolling in. It will all be carbon free or at least carbon neutral. Of course without artificial derivatives in the form of Carbon Credits we probably don't have enough plantable trees to reach carbon neutral. Oh well, fossil fuels will be gone in 10 years and then we are home free. See everything is free and the only requirement is to be unwilling to work. Hey, I can be unwilling to work so Check 👌 & Check 👌.

If we run low on money Uncle Sugar can just open more banks and extend credit and that is all right from that horse's mouth or other end, 😲.
That was the part of the Green New Deal 4027where a little coffee came out of my nose.


I will miss airplanes a lot but, at least we'll have the bullet trains running everywhere. California can help the rest of the country develop those.

I'm planning a trip to Hawaii and I can get to California riding a unicorn whose flatulence is only pixie dust so that's OK but... Just how much does a bullet train from Los Angeles to Honolulu cost anyway? Doesn't really matter I guess since I have money to burn. oops, 😲sorry. I forgot there will be no burning or fire at all.

You can reach me at cave #18, that is the very cold cave #18.
Perhaps I need to throw another Global Warming report on the fire. Oops, 😲sorry again, I forgot,
Goblin
 
Last edited:
:eek:
I really don't think we need to worry.

I have gone through all the numbers 😵 and especially this week with Alexandria Occasional-Cortex's Green New Deal I am resting much easier and while reading it I only spit up a small amount of coffee through my nose.

Now all I have to do is sit on my couch and wait for my free house, free salary, free health care, free food(no beef though). etc., etc., etc. to all start rolling in. It will all be carbon free or at least carbon neutral. Of course without artificial derivatives in the form of Carbon Credits we probably don't have enough plantable trees to reach carbon neutral. Oh well, fossil fuels will be gone in 10 years and then we are home free. See everything is free and the only requirement is to be unwilling to work. Hey, I can be unwilling to work so Check 👌 & Check 👌.

If we run low on money Uncle Sugar can just open more banks and extend credit and that is all right from that horse's mouth or other end, 😲.
That was the part of the Green New Deal View attachment 4027where a little coffee came out of my nose.


I will miss airplanes a lot but, at least we'll have the bullet trains running everywhere. California can help the rest of the country develop those.

I'm planning a trip to Hawaii and I can get to California riding a unicorn whose flatulence is only pixie dust so that's OK but... Just how much does a bullet train from Los Angeles to Honolulu cost anyway? Doesn't really matter I guess since I have money to burn. oops, 😲sorry. I forgot there will be no burning or fire at all.

You can reach me at cave #18, that is the very cold cave #18.
Perhaps I need to throw another Global Warming report on the fire. Oops, 😲sorry again, I forgot,
Goblin
Ok feels like a trip to Disney land, or maybe Alice in Wonderland cause I feel like we just went down the rabbit hole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top